+- heRO-Server Forum (https://www.pandoraonline.net/forum)
+-- Forum: Game Related (https://www.pandoraonline.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Suggestions/Questions (https://www.pandoraonline.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=19)
+--- Thread: Why is Alde/Nontrans Castles There? (/showthread.php?tid=11287)
RE:????Why is Alde/Nontrans Castles There? - Force-Attuned Krogoth - 09-04-2009
Nidsrule Wrote:I can't see any way any of the current guilds can change their approach to WoE which will not only maintain the balance of power in trans WoE but fix the issues being presented with Alde. If people make the changes you suggest and one guild does step up to take on Alde, the underlying problem shifts from one form of WoE to the other and we end up back at where we started.Those conditions are your own, and not in any way related to the mechanics of RO generally, or heRO specifically. What it comes down to is you don't want to give up trans woe. You cannot claim that to be a physical impossibility, because someone has already done it. It's a hard choice to make, I don't deny. But you have an example.
Yuriohs Wrote:And yet if we change that question to "Why should we change it?" the same thing applies. Where is the argument supporting that Alde is both a fair system and is working as intended in it's current implementation? Don't just say that it's been around for a long time and therefore it works. Compare the amount of support Krim received when he was arguing against Alde in the thread he posted and compare it to the support there is to have changes made to Alde now.If the question is "why should we change," which is really what we're discussing here, then in the default answer is and should be "we shouldn't." If I can't prove it fixed, and you can't prove it broke, status quo prevails. Change for change's sake is a shitty way to run a community.
Yuriohs Wrote:Look at Alde now and tell me that either of these points apply. Alde doesn't promote a larger WoEing population (in it's current implementation) and as such the only guild that does attend it on a regular basis gets to sit on a constant supply of econ.What I'm telling you over and over and over is that the low turnout is within your power to change. If you dislike the situation, then get off your ass. You don't like the idea of Alde existing without competition, you don't like the idea of competing for it, and you are entitled to that. The fact remains you have the means to fix it, acting within the system. The only thing stopping you is the decision you make, without coercion or influence, EVERY Sunday and EVERY Wednesday. Not Bamboo, not Alde, not untrans woe, not the GM team, not Aldebaran, and not the heRO community. You have only yourself to blame.
Yuriohs Wrote:This discussion started off as a complaint about the concept of Alde. Whether or not BS is the guild holding it, the same underlying problems remain with Alde's current implementation. Stop talking as if BS is the the root of all problems here when it clearly isn't.Actually, I'm talking as if your apathy is the root of the problem. If you care, you should use all the tools at your disposal. Talk is cheap.
RE: Why is Alde/Nontrans Castles There? - Yuriohs - 09-04-2009
So your saying Trans people, who trans WoE's, should sacrifice all that time the put in to build up eco, to fight the other powerful guild to get alde because we want it closed?
That didn't happen in Geffen, since we didnt' have a big enough community to support it, it was closed down.
No one QQ'd about it because we wanted more competition. We didnt' QQ and say we wanted it to stay the same. We wanted more.
And now, your in the same situation we are, but you want it to stay open because you think we should stop what were doing and go over to where you are and provide you with competition?
You want us, to give up pront and pay for that matter, just to attack a castle with 20 eco.
And then what? What happens after that? You want us to hold it? Stop Trans Woeing? and Start Non Trans Woeing?
Think about after we hold it, because after that Trans WoE will suffer, if we all decide to make non trans alts, and hold alde.
And guess who will be loling in pront?
Your Ally.
Think about what happens after we hold it instead of thinking (well since they won't go and take alde, it shouldn't close)
Why do you think we won't take alde, its not worth it in the long run it ? Point is that it doesn't prove a point taking it, you still have no active competition in alde.
Seriously, what can you think of a time where a regular WoE castle has been empty for months at a time? When LW had pront, there were still attempts at it, when behe held it the same.
The only time I can think of a regular WoE castle being empty exepct for people like kadar breaking is geffen, and that castle was closed.
Geffen also got last minute guilds wanting a castle that couldn't touch payon or pront.
RE: Why is Alde/Nontrans Castles There? - Force-Attuned Krogoth - 09-04-2009
If you want the system changed, you should get what you pay for. Which is, so far, nothing. Who would stop the owner of a castle from requesting it closed?
RE: Why is Alde/Nontrans Castles There? - Yuriohs - 09-04-2009
a GM? Because its their decision?
RE: ????Why is Alde/Nontrans Castles There? - Astroboi - 09-04-2009
Force-Attuned Krogoth Wrote:Nidsrule Wrote:I can't see any way any of the current guilds can change their approach to WoE which will not only maintain the balance of power in trans WoE but fix the issues being presented with Alde. If people make the changes you suggest and one guild does step up to take on Alde, the underlying problem shifts from one form of WoE to the other and we end up back at where we started.Those conditions are your own, and not in any way related to the mechanics of RO generally, or heRO specifically.??What it comes down to is you don't want to give up trans woe.??You cannot claim that to be a physical impossibility, because someone has already done it.??It's a hard choice to make, I don't deny.??But you have an example.
Those conditions might be his own, they are still fact. Since you seemingly don't woe and are not aware of the current WoE situation, I'll break it down for you. There are 5 regular woe active guilds: STD, Behe, NE, Rev and BS. No more than that. STD and Behe are the 2 stronger ones, and are arguably on the same level. They both maintain that level of balance that makes it so no guild has a significant advantage over any other (i.e. what LW was for a while). They are both currently holding a castle. NE and Rev constantly pressure both STD and Behe so they dont have it too easy, although didn't prove strong enough yet to break either of them. Now what happens if...
-Behe decides to take action and attack Alde? This is currently impossible, both are allied.
-STD decides to take action and attack Alde? Rev and NE will exlusively fight over Pront, while Payon stays untouched. Payon quickly and easily reaches 100 eco without much effort.
-NE and Rev decide to take action and attack Alde? Pront and Payon quicky and easily reach 100 eco without much effort, with their only opposition out of the picture.
RE: Why is Alde/Nontrans Castles There? - Aaronock - 09-04-2009
Zing Astro said it without me having to at this time around :x
RE: Why is Alde/Nontrans Castles There? - n3xus - 09-05-2009
Nice debate going on here.??I was wondering when this would come up again.??Looks like u came back just in time krim!??=)??Long post coming...
@street
I've seen revenga in alde before.??They went in it a few times back then actually.??Before they transed and started playing in trans castles.
Now to get to actual points of the thread, hopefully with a different perspective on some points, starting with math...
This was the formula for chests.
(Economy/5) + 4 = Number of chest spawned.
Alde at 20 eco = (20/5) + 4 = 8 chests/day
Pront at 100 eco = (100/5) + 4 = 24 chests/day
So basically, a trans castle is worth 3x more than a non-trans castle.??If a guild had max eco in prontera for 10 days, it will take the Alde castle 30 days (1 month) to match the number of chests, not including the time it takes to get there, for simplicity).??Just wanted to point that out.??If this is not the formula being used now, then i made a mistake on that part =P
From what i can gather from the different points of views,??I think the root cause of the debate is the lack of CONSISTENT competition that is causing problems.??It's not Bamboo Squad taking advantage of the current system.
Looking at how things are currently:
- trans woe = 17+ vs 18+ vs 10+ vs extras on a good day
- nontrans = 8+ vs 8+ usual turnout?
When I used to participate in alde woe (last year), it was like 5+ vs 5+ on a good day.??That's not really much growth in a year.??Geffen on the other hand was raiding party vs 0-4.??This could have been abused and the castle eco could have gone to 100 possibly, from the lack of competition at the time.
For the sake of argument, let's say one of the trans alliances does take the time to create a nontrans team and takes over alde (Apoc/Behe with broken BS alliance).??They max alde eco to 20.??BS gives them good competition for alde every woe and ownership changes hands several times. Now it's probably up to 14+ vs 14+ (superior growth in a few WoEs).??At this point, STD/LoA/DD will have a much easier time taking a trans castle and investing until the eco is about 50+.??I stop at 50+ because probably at this point, Apoc/Behe may start to take interest and decide to leave alde for a few reasons:
- more eco
- originally had more fun playing trans characters in the first place
- more challenge with a different set of players, not just BS
Once this happens, BS is back to taking ownership of Alde for a long period of time again with less competition.??Actually, this example was already shown by Pistis in a different way with LW breaking alde for a little while and then choosing to go back to trans woe. LW chose to keep their 100 eco vs their 20 eco and no one came to alde to fight BS on a consistent basis.
Just to clarify, what i mean by consistent competition is competition by 2+ factions that are somewhat evenly matched.??If one of these factions were to take on the lesser guilds, the lesser guilds would have a hard time winning consistently.??If one of these factions where to join/ally with another, the balance of power would shift by a lot. They recruit. They farm. They level.??They mvp.??They pay attention to what the competition is doing.??They even sometimes spy (seen on hero as well as other servers).??ie. not the casual player.
Looking at this idea of consistent competition a little closer, take a look at the 4-year history of the server.
Guilds that put forth a concentrated effort to obtain and keep ownership of a trans castle for a long period of time:
Death Dealers
Lordz of Anarchy
Legendary Warriors
Behemoth
The Rekinjutsu Way
Order of Chaos
Guardians Spirits (any of you guys still around/visit???)
Angel Empire
Apocalypse
Cavaleiros Do Zodiaco
Sparta
Twilight Sky
Genesis
Severe Tire Damage / Nocturnal Echo / jXp / El Tricolor / ReVeNgA (not quite there, yet?)
Probably some other guilds that i forgot or where disbanded.??It's late and too tired to think harder.??Anyone remember any other ones???While some of these guilds did have similar members, it wasn't exactly the same group.??Leaders changed.??Members quit.??Some guild-hopped.??Others decided to focus on different aspects like school/work/life/WoW/etc.??
Guilds that put forth the same amount of concentrated effort for Alde castle for a long period of time:
Bamboo Squad
LW ( for <1 month? )
Granted while Alde has only been open for 2.5 years, one can clearly see that there is a discrepancy in this list.??2.5 years is by no means, a short amount of time, since heRo is 4 years old.??There has been plenty of time for consistent competition to develop for retro WoE, but the list shows that it hasn't.??
Proxyt Wrote:Since I've been fighting IN Alde, we've been broken at least 5 times in the past 5 months. Probably more. Just the attackers couldn't get past us once we fortified our def and called in help, so they left. Not our fault man.
5 times in 5 months???Let's double that.??10 times in 5 months.??Trans castles change ownership 10 times in 2 weeks.??No question there is far more consistent competition overall for the trans castles.??More people in this community definitely see trans woe as "more fun" since more people show up for it.??As can be seen from this thread, more people see non-trans woe as more of an obligation to go to Alde ("BS has had it too long, we gotta give up our trans fun to go try and break it a couple of times...").??This philosophy is by no means Bamboo's fault.??BS just decided a long time ago to take advantage of the system and have fun in retro woe.??
But that's the actual problem.??It's not BS, it's the system.??This isn't a bug that a person found to abuse like macroing or using a DS packet.??This is more of a design flaw in the actual system itself.??As things are setup currently, retro (or newbie or whatever) WoE is not fostering more competition and fun, like the closing of Geffen did.??You might say "it's not our fault we don't have competition" and I agree with you.??But that's precisely my point.??It's not Bamboo's fault, it's a design flaw.??Some people saw it a couple of years ago, but it took BS this much time to fully expose it to more of the community.??Hence, you got more people attacking the system now with only BS defending it.??
To look at Pistis' argument (I think it was hers), the argument of one guild being strong enough to control trans and nontrans castles at the same time is not really a strong argument either.??HeRo history has shown that if one guild is strong, SOMEONE has to come and rally the other mid-tier guilds together to change things, sometimes to the point of 1 guild vs server:
AE vs server
Twilight Sky vs Guardian Spirits/others
LoA/DD vs LW/Behe/Apoc/BS/El Tri/server
LW vs server
Imagine if Geffen stayed open, and people developed eco.??As soon as it gets to about 50 or so, people leave pront and go for geffen.??Then the eco will swing to prontera and so the cycle goes.??Consequently, the meager competition led to the voluntary closing of geffen in order to foster a bigger competitive spirit for the community.??And what happened???No one really complained about Geffen closing.??WoE became more fun again.??It's this consistency of competition that people seem to have a problem with in Alde woe.
Just like the argument "it's not Bamboo's fault no one consistently fights us every single woe to the point that we can't max out eco", "it's not guild X's fault if the server can't come together and take a castle away from guild X."
Whenever a guild comes to power, it's only a matter of time before they lose it.??It gets lonely at the top.??People move on to other things, ie. other servers, work, school, outside life, WoW, boredom, bigger challenge, or whatever reason they got pushed from the top.??Either that or the rest of the server puts their differences aside and actually joins to take them down.??
The "one guild in power" argument is BS!
(pun intended, nothing personal, small joke, couldn't resist) =P
If this truly wasn't a problem, then why are the only ones speaking up in defense of alde are from Bamboo Squad???None of these "other competitive guilds that fight all the time in Alde" saying anything???Probably because there is NO OTHER GUILD THAT CONSISTENTLY fights in Alde aside from BS.??If the system was balanced, this wouldn't happen.??It's not about majority rules, it's about balance.??If it was indeed majority rules, dual-clienting would never have been removed as more of the community actually favored it.??As it was, the GMs thought it was detrimental to the community as a whole and changed the status quo, which was dual-clienting at the time.??In this case, it is the reverse, majority WANTS the change.
Speaking of the status quo, the reason it has become what it is on hero about nontrans woe is because not enough of the community probably saw (or cared enough) to speak up.??Some tried before, but that didn't really get anywhere.??It took this much time for enough people to actually say something again.??
Krogoth Wrote:If I can't prove it fixed, and you can't prove it broke, status quo prevails. Change for change's sake is a shitty way to run a community.
Why would you believe that challenging the status quo is a bad thing in a non-broken state???History's filled with examples of people challenging the status quo only based on a hunch or a dream.??They merely wanted to follow their own beliefs.??
Wright Brothers & flying: status quo = "if man was meant to fly, God would have given him wings!"
Columbus: status quo = "The world is flat, wtf are u doing sir???You're gonna get us killed!??Turn back now oh noes!"
If not for these people (and other dreamers), things would have stayed under the status quo and we would not be where we are today.??
As for "resource management" and splitting forces, I think 2.5 years is enough time to figure out how to devote resources in this game.??The interest just isn't there as things are with the current system, through no fault of Bamboo's.??Simply a design flaw.
IDEAS
Take a look at the guilds in the first list again.??There is a clear indication that consistent competition for Alde barely exists (2 guilds???).??To change this, I think separating Trans and Nontrans WoE will be the closest thing to bringing the two sides together.??The advocates for splitting get what they want and those wanting it to stay the same will get more competition.??No more "come take Alde and prove it first!" talk.??Nontrans woe will be packed with several guilds and people can prove/disprove till their hearts' content.??Isn't that the spirit of WoE in the first place?
Wednesday Woe could have 1h Trans castles only.??Sunday could have 1st hour trans, 2nd hour nontrans.??The trans castles since they can go to 100, can change hands more easily by keeping it to 2 days.??Alde eco could be raised up to 50 since it's possible to keep it for a week.??If so desired, a 2nd non-trans castle can be opened (both eco maxed at 20 in this case, still change hands once a week) since there will be tons and tons more fighting for them.??Bamboo Squad can possibly be compensated by letting them keep one of the nontrans castle for a month???HeRo still keeps its uniqueness by having a retro woe.??Plus the retro woe will have a ton of action.??I've heard people join HeRo for the retro woe and saw that it was a little boring and not what they were hoping for.??At least this way, there's more consistent competition for those that actually join for this very feature.??
Don't take it the wrong way.??Personally, I like retro woe better than trans woe.??It's way more balanced.??I'm only trying to improve the system.??I'm not talking for anyone else.??This is just what I've observed here.
Like Obama said, "It's time for a change!"
Ok yeah, no more jokes/puns.??I'll stick to my day-job.??It's 3AM and I need sleep... goodnite!
RE: Why is Alde/Nontrans Castles There? - Yuriohs - 09-07-2009
Discussion Over?
RE:??Why is Alde/Nontrans Castles There? - Gojira - 09-07-2009
Yuriohs Wrote:Discussion Over?
Heh, it probably just changed to the poll section topic....
RE: Why is Alde/Nontrans Castles There? - Kulluminatii - 09-07-2009
I think n3xus covered everything there is to cover on this topic...great post man
.