MTG - Printable Version +- heRO-Server Forum (https://www.pandoraonline.net/forum) +-- Forum: The outside world (https://www.pandoraonline.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=7) +--- Forum: General (https://www.pandoraonline.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=8) +--- Thread: MTG (/showthread.php?tid=12872) |
MTG - Snapplewee - 01-03-2010 Alright time for some butthole pwnage. Krim is wrong. +3/+3 is not 99% of the time more useful than +4/+0. I'd rather wait to smack someone harder than Wild Growth my creature. 90% of MTG cards are useless in Tournaments, except for sealed. Which is why I only play sealed (drafts/preleases). Discuss your decks. I will critique nicely except for Krim. RE: MTG - Galt - 01-03-2010 One already made here: this link. RE: MTG - Général_Argos - 01-03-2010 ZOMG 1 MORE DAMAGE vs you can make your creature survive a fight if using it in defense and you could use the +3/+3 to save a creature from a burn damage but I have to agree 90% of the cards are useless the only reason to have that +4/0 instead of +3/+3 is if your deck is pure red RE: MTG - Aaronock - 01-03-2010 I'm sorry, +3/+3 is usually better. Toughness does have its place in the game, it keeps a creature around that needs to block or will get hit by heavy creatures. Suicide/Aggro decks might appreciate the +4/+0 more but overall, the versatility of +3/+3 can't be denied. There is a reason Invigorate gets played after all in casual occasionally by green players. ;O RE: MTG - Général_Argos - 01-03-2010 I'll post my famous white deck once I retrieve it from all my boxes in the garage c_c' RE: MTG - Session - 01-03-2010 *Brain fries* Mtg looks really confusing -_-a RE: MTG - Aaronock - 01-03-2010 A good card game comes off as confusing. RO is a confusing game too sometimes RE: MTG - Session - 01-03-2010 Haha, I don't think Ill ever play it, since I don't know anyone that actually plays it... RE: MTG - GM-Ayu - 01-03-2010 I think that we can really use the other thread and don't need 2 identical MTG thread at the same time *locks* |