![]() |
|
@changeleader - Printable Version +- heRO-Server Forum (https://www.pandoraonline.net/forum) +-- Forum: Game Related (https://www.pandoraonline.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Suggestions/Questions (https://www.pandoraonline.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=19) +--- Thread: @changeleader (/showthread.php?tid=4268) |
@changeleader - Bloody - 12-02-2007 Can @changeleader be enabled? Unless there is a way to abuse this, I don't see any disadvantages to it. Sometimes the party leader has to go suddenly and it's too much trouble to break party, re-make, invite everyone. I am sure you know dozens of other scenarios where the command can be very useful :\ So yeah, add plx? RE: @changeleader - Whispers - 12-02-2007 Something we could definitely use and not at all bad. Aren't parties disbanded with the seperation of the host or do they remain intact? ![]() In any case, there are far more possibilities with this suggestion from the little frog kitty than there are fallbacks. I vote go.
RE: @changeleader - Rika - 12-02-2007 Parties remain intact regardless of whether or not the leader is online, but it lacks the adding/removing powers for those remaining in power. I personally wouldn't mind seeing this added. RE: @changeleader - Craix - 12-02-2007 yeah,it only falls apart if the leader leaves party, and I would love this command, its always fun when leadership gets pawned off on me when the leader leaves RE: @changeleader - Rhino_Man - 12-02-2007 parties do not automatically disband when the leader leaves though. RE: @changeleader - Bloody - 12-02-2007 I am sure they meant leave as in /leave not leave as in log off. To remove confusion: Once the leader /leave 's his/her party, the party gets disbanded completely. RE: @changeleader - Craix - 12-02-2007 ya, thats what I meant... *whistles* RE: @changeleader - GM-Pandora - 12-02-2007 I'll think about it. |