G?n?ral_Argos Wrote:I agree, but I don't think that RMS is chasing wich server is cheating and ban them, plus I see nowhere on RMS something saying that using incentive to make their population to vote is forbiden.??
Having some kind of "Reviewer Crown", like the donator laurel (but without stat) could be a correct incentive.??
Only downside I see to this is that it gives more work to the gms, having to keep a "Reviewer Crown" list up-to-date.??Seeing how they always take the time to write a thanks to those who made/updated a review, I don't think it would be THAT much more work.??A npc could do the job of giving the item.??The only really more work would be to watch wich review are about to expire, and remove the item manually.??Unless its possible to make an item that 'last 6 months'.??
That is a great idea Argos. If you are right and HeRO cannot be penalized for giving out incentives, then a 'Reviewer Crown" seems like the perfect incentive to give.
If having a Reviewer Crown that expires after 6 months is not possible, then maybe making a different crown available every six months would be a better idea. Plus, as a bonus, whoever has written a review twice in a year and has both crowns for that year, will automatically be entered in a drawing to receive some in-game goodies( maybe something aesthetic, or a few Old Blue/Purple Boxes). Or if a year is too long, then a drawing every six months.
