Kretzer
Fat-Ality
![*](images/star.png) ![*](images/star.png) ![*](images/star.png) ![*](images/star.png) ![*](images/star.png)
Posts: 948
Threads: 53
Joined: Jun 2008
|
RE:??repeatable exp quest
KrazeEKrakker Wrote:Say no to repeatable exp quests. end of story. >.>
If added, they should only be up to level 50 only or something for the noobs that wish to use it. I left iRO because of stupid crap like this and I would hate to see HeRO go down the same pathetic path. It's been said over and over again, RO is about the grind, if you want quests, go to WoW. >.>
This post is all hate and no reasons. Unless you count WoW = Quests. RO = Grind as a good reason.
GM-Ayu Wrote:Fyrus Carmin Wrote:http://irowiki.org/wiki/Repeatable_EXP_Quest
According to the first sentence. there's no level limit.
According to rest of the entire article, there's definitely a level limit.
I personally am not against the concept of repeatable exp quest, but am against THESE repeatable exp quests. Why oh why did they decide to choose the popular monster drops (bacillus from sleeper map, anolians skin from anolian, huge leaf from leaf cat, sharp leaf from mavka) just to make the current grinding location even more crowded and even less reasons to get out of the current spots >.>; Instead of using this opportunity to balance out maps with bad exp, we only made the difference in amount of exp we get between the 'good maps' and the 'bad maps' worse.
One main point against exp quests though is that we have resetter, so you don't need to rely on quests to train up smiths and chemists who are to forge/brew.
So in conclusion, my personal stance is that if we're making repeatable quests, can we have our own repeatable quest instead of some of these crappy iRO ones >>;
As for the idea of repeatable exp quest itself being in heRO or not, it's not up to me but pandora for it ;
Quesadilla Wrote:When iRO added them, a lot of people complained, saying that the quests made it too easy to level. When somebody on iRO Valk becomes transed in two weeks, there's a problem.
As well as the fact that it would make things too easy, this would make it easier for bots to crowd the maps just to get the items needed. When bots level off of monsters to get 50 items, they can give the items to their owner and use the 50 items to level, too. This would be DOUBLE-BAAAAAAD, as the bot owner would be killing two birds with one stone and adding more weight to their cheating.
This would be almost inevitable, too; I'm not just throwing out rare possibilities.. When I was on iRO Valk for maybe two weeks, I checked out PecoPecos, which was a spot to get the Beaks. When I started, they had maybe 40 people on that map, but they were all real people. Two weeks later, they had a LOT more people on the map, but mainly they were bots. There were so many bots it made it impossible to actually find a Pecopeco that wasn't taken. It was very bad.
I checked out the other spots, just to see if they were crowded too, and-holy crap. Yeah.
Bad, bad idea. Seriously.
You seem to forget heRO has around 340 players at peak time, while iRO has 7000, and that heRO is 99% if not 100% Bot Free.
(This post was last modified: 05-16-2009, 02:42 PM by Kretzer.)
|
|
05-16-2009, 02:40 PM |
|