Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Regarding whitesmiths
Teddy Offline
Junior Member
**

Posts: 12
Threads: 1
Joined: Mar 2009
#5
RE: Regarding whitesmiths
Done a little testing, it's more than 183.
186 was still faster than 185, as far as I could see, haven't had the chance to try anything above that.

Either way, at 186 it's more of less as fast as you can click, so any higher wouldn't do you many favours anyway. Turns out you were right >:[
06-04-2009, 09:19 AM
Find Reply


Messages In This Thread
Regarding whitesmiths - by conch - 06-03-2009, 08:17 AM
RE: Regarding whitesmiths - by Zaratus - 06-03-2009, 08:46 AM
RE: Regarding whitesmiths - by conch - 06-03-2009, 01:05 PM
RE: Regarding whitesmiths - by conch - 06-04-2009, 12:48 AM
RE: Regarding whitesmiths - by Teddy - 06-04-2009, 09:19 AM
RE: Regarding whitesmiths - by conch - 06-04-2009, 10:18 AM
RE: Regarding whitesmiths - by Kretzer - 06-04-2009, 03:22 PM
RE: Regarding whitesmiths - by Zaratus - 06-04-2009, 03:55 PM
RE: Regarding whitesmiths - by Sakurato - 06-04-2009, 05:52 PM
RE: Regarding whitesmiths - by teOx - 06-04-2009, 05:52 PM
RE:??Regarding whitesmiths - by conch - 06-04-2009, 07:15 PM
RE: Regarding whitesmiths - by mahawirasd - 06-04-2009, 10:06 PM

Forum Jump: