Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Why is Alde/Nontrans Castles There?
mahawirasd Offline
Posting Freak
*****

Posts: 3,839
Threads: 50
Joined: Jul 2008
#91
RE: Why is Alde/Nontrans Castles There?
<3 Nids and Pistis.

I understand where you're coming from Nids. But in the case non-trans WOE is moved to another day, don't you think it would allow the chance for a guild to have even more dominance?

then perhaps upping the eco of alde could nudge people who view alde as "easy eco" to actually WOE there?

if you say that "it seems to be a far more steady source of econ compared to trans castles.", why don't those guilds who want a steady source of econ go and pawn alde as it is now?

again, my main point about "sacrifice" is to understand that in life you can't always have your cake and eat it too. If you want a "steady source of econ" then go to alde and forgo trans woe that day. If you want retro woe action, then go to alde and forgo trans woe.


-w-
09-02-2009, 08:31 PM
Find Reply


Messages In This Thread
Why is Alde/Nontrans Castles There? - by Yuriohs - 08-31-2009, 08:17 AM
RE: Why is Alde/Nontrans Castles There? - by Chop - 08-31-2009, 10:34 PM
RE: Why is Alde/Nontrans Castles There? - by mahawirasd - 09-02-2009, 08:31 PM

Forum Jump: