Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Why is Alde/Nontrans Castles There?
Général_Argos Offline
Removed by GM
*****

Posts: 3,012
Threads: 144
Joined: Jan 2006
RE: Why is Alde/Nontrans Castles There?
Suggestion : [(Eco/4) +0] cap : 60 eco
The maximum number of chest would go 8->15 but the formula forces to invest to get rewards

Since the retro-woe will occur once a week only I think it is a good idea to make guilds having to invest instead of getting a flat minimum number of chests

Flat minimum = Big guild X breaks emp at 5 min before the end of the woe but don't really care about that retro woe and they get 4 chests * 7 = 28 per week without much time/effort investment.

No flat minimum = Big guild X have nothing to win unless they invest. Having invested gives an incentive to then defend the castle. Much better balance.

That is why I suggest [(Eco/4) +0] cap : 60 eco

IGN: 9000KRIM Alts:  Morradin, KRIMSTEAL
Banned: Krimlin, Krimlogas, Lord_Krimlogas, General_Argos
Krim's grocery list

¯_¯_¯_¯_¯_¯_¯_¯_¯_¯_¯_¯_¯_-KRIMLIN-¯_¯_¯_¯_¯_¯_¯_¯_¯_¯_¯_¯_¯_¯/
Murphy law.  The only true one.  
[Image: krimstyleg.jpg]
09-29-2009, 04:16 PM
Find Reply


Messages In This Thread
Why is Alde/Nontrans Castles There? - by Yuriohs - 08-31-2009, 08:17 AM
RE: Why is Alde/Nontrans Castles There? - by Chop - 08-31-2009, 10:34 PM
RE: Why is Alde/Nontrans Castles There? - by G?n?ral_Argos - 09-29-2009, 04:16 PM

Forum Jump: