Huntress Wrote:Trying my best to encourage a small or new guild to get into WoE, you guys just really don't get it and will nitpick at anything.
For some people it's not encouraging to start WoEing if they get absolutely nothing in the process, specially if they waste ressources to only get their behind kicked by the more established guilds, unless they capture a castle, which is unlikely at first until said guild becomes bigger, better geared, etc.
Fair enough...I guess we don't get it. Still, its not going to be them(as in the other WoE guild) getting the castle, it will be Behe and BS getting the castle.
Something from your first post I forgot to comment on earlier...
Quote:- Your guildies who woe with us will be entitled to the same rewards as Bamboo members who WoE, rewards are distributed after the war, in Aldebaran, in the form of gears or zeny. So without having the force to take a castle yourself yet you can already get the benefice so long as you participate.
Honestly...I don't see how this can be enforced without some sort of bias. Most likely, the best items will go to those who are in Behe/BS while the leftovers will be given to the "lesser" guilds. Then again I could be totally wrong and you guys will truly treat members from all guilds equally
.
Quote:I'm offering another guild the chance to get started on the woe scene easier than most of us had it, we need more woe guild, and we're not going to magically get a strong force that appears out of thin air, most guilds started small.
I agree, we definitely aren't going to magically get WoE guilds. However, I believe its wrong to give these start up guilds a false sense of accomplishment. The main reason we are having this problem with WoE is the
lack of competition, lessening the already weak competition by forming alliances isn't going to help anybody...except those already in power.
Guess I still don't get it...right?
