Poll: Should real BG be implemented
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Yes
88.00%
44 88.00%
No
12.00%
6 12.00%
Total 50 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Should Standard Battlegrounds be implemented
Landon Offline
Snappin necks, Cashin Checks
*****

Posts: 758
Threads: 63
Joined: Jul 2009
#4
RE: Should Standard Battlegrounds be implemented
You know how to solve our PVP problem? Attract players who like to pvp. And you know how to do that? Not buy implementing headgears (lets face it, we have enough), not buy making custom monsters and dungeons (We're lacking when it comes to dungeons anyways). But by doing things that cater to them, buy implementing BG, offering guild packages, advertising as a woe server. Every new players I meet who is interest in WoE on this server leaves after a day when they find out who bad it is. 9 times out of ten I find a player who wants to woe and they're gone the next day.

The problem with normal BG is that I can imagine the big woe guilds abusing it but I mean, BG isn't only for items. But guilds who are interested in parties and having fun would love the friendly competition that BG offers. Sure its abusable but how do you expect people to benefit from the items that BG offers when you can only do it every 3 hours. And by the time you get to make it to BG, you get RANDOMLY chosen so you still might not even make it in, then you get to wait another three hours to get a chance to play.
It helps people get the woe mats that they would normally have to spend hours per week farming and plus its not that bad to do in your spare time, since woe reducts are added, its a good place to get a feel for woe. Why not have this for our server? All people do is complain about how bad it is to prepare for woe and the BG weps are probably the best PVP weps that you can get for a char other than god items and MVP cards. So nows your chance to catch up to those lucky vet's who make woe "horrible for everyone."

The problem I have with this BG is that its pretty much going to be a cloak fest since sins have such a large map to hide on and they'll be waiting it out in the corner until theres one person left or the decide to give up. I can imagine some people taking advantage of that just to mess with people and hinder them from completing it.
SO PLEASE, PLEASE implement the normal BG and see how it works out, thats all we're asking for. Just give it a try and see how it works. Sure the eathena version of BG may be bugged but lots of servers have gotten it a year and a half ago and its running just fine for them. And the best part is, they did it without making its players wait and volunteer for testing. If the GMs want to implement something that they consider BG at least get player feedback before implementing it and if you take out the essential components of BG, don't even bother calling it BG in the first place.


TL;DR

AT LEAST ASK THE PLAYERS WHAT THEY WANT. BG IS GOOD FOR SERVERSSS
Hercules 97 High Priest
Shepard 99 Whitesmith
Hawk 98 Clown
Barossa 97 Professor
(This post was last modified: 02-23-2011, 06:17 PM by Landon.)
02-23-2011, 05:57 PM
Find Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Should Standard Battlegrounds be implemented - by Landon - 02-23-2011, 05:57 PM

Forum Jump: