Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
RCX and heRO
Aevyn Offline
Member
***

Posts: 97
Threads: 13
Joined: Jun 2010
#10
RE: RCX and heRO
I was just poking at your wording, which I am sorry about. My intention was not to argue.

I have never used the application, I have just skimmed through information about it. I understand, as I said in my original post, that it's created in good faith and all. I also understand that it's not a bot application. The issue is that it's a client hook; a packet/memory reader. As far as I understand, it does not send anything, but this should not be reason enough to officially allow it as a lot of cheating can be done without sending information to the server. Again, I'm not saying that this specific application does this, but if you allow the use of one packet/memory reader... where do you draw the line, and how do you prove that those rules are being followed?

As you said, the GM's have already stated that they do not support it, and that's really the end of the discussion. I just figured people should be aware of what kind of an application it is, so they know what they're getting into.
07-09-2011, 06:48 PM
Find Reply


Messages In This Thread
RCX and heRO - by suchi1 - 07-08-2011, 11:01 PM
RE: RCX and heRO - by iSpam - 07-09-2011, 12:03 AM
RE: RCX and heRO - by Incarn - 07-09-2011, 12:07 AM
RE: RCX and heRO - by Ngjoko - 07-09-2011, 01:04 AM
RE: RCX and heRO - by GM-Circe - 07-09-2011, 09:16 AM
RE: RCX and heRO - by Aevyn - 07-09-2011, 10:53 AM
RE: RCX and heRO - by Incarn - 07-09-2011, 05:41 PM
RE: RCX and heRO - by Aevyn - 07-09-2011, 06:06 PM
RE: RCX and heRO - by Incarn - 07-09-2011, 06:33 PM
RE: RCX and heRO - by Aevyn - 07-09-2011, 06:48 PM

Forum Jump: