Not so bright

[Motenai_Ronin]

shame on bloody for swiping Darth Vader Epic Fail poster

Lord Jugger is not pleased

I applaud LW's leaders for their *Herculean* (With emphasis) tasks

and Bloody, Ex, and all others not mentioned here, for their untiring dedication of camping their gears

and in reply to the comment bout Players on 1-3 years
I been on this server roughly 2 years (i took a year off in between)

I have 1 trans char (lvl 98***)

1 non-trans 2nd class
2 non-trans 1st class

1 non-99/50 extended class (Ranker)

Which goes to show anyone, that is not just the time, its the dedication these guys have put into Hero and not nobody's help that they got these stuff.

(This on a purely personal note, Ex did tend to rub me the wrong way - but Bloody, from what i've noticed, is good-natured)

Annnnddd.....anything I say about Ex is purely jabbering-niceties, I owe my guild to Ex's help (not many know but Ex was in my guild before he built his legacy mwah~)

soooo....mmmrhhhh rant over i guess.

[Eldakar]

No one is talking about me

[Sakurato]

No one is talking about me

Saving the best for last?

[Bloody]

Sorry Kev but you are too noob for this topic

but Bloody, from what i've noticed, is good-natured)

Many would disagree, but thanks all the same.

[teOx]

lol wtf i hope its me hes talking about though probably not gufufufufufufufu

[Maiden]

but Bloody, from what i've noticed, is good-natured)

Many would disagree, but thanks all the same.

I agree

Anyway..now that's just a silly review...If the review was talking about Bloody (and he hasn't played seriously in MONTHS, so I don't know what that guy's talking about) I know for a fact that Bloody has worked hard for all of his items, I work with him (sometimes ).

I'd also like to see this overpowered equipment because we should take that and head over to Beezl.

The lag...it's been going on for only what..a few days? I don't know, if it's been longer then I haven't noticed.

The GMs..well let's not open that can of worms but it wouldn't be fair to say that the entire staff is unfriendly and stuck up, especially since the reviewer probably hadn't even been around long enough to meet them all. As for "begging" for good reviews, I'd hardly call it that. At most, I'd say they push the idea when there's a large gathering of players, but that's it. I haven't been to many events lately but from what I can remember it was just a simple "Don't forget to vote!" type of reminder.

[Bloody]

At most, I'd say they push the idea when there's a large gathering of players, but that's it. I haven't been to many events lately but from what I can remember it was just a simple "Don't forget to vote!" type of reminder.

Well maybe this idiot would rather have the GMs close the server for 5 mins everyday so people would go and vote/write a review like some other servers >_>

The lag...it's been going on for only what..a few days? I don't know, if it's been longer then I haven't noticed.

When did we do Valk? It was about 15 hours ago right? Was there any lag for you at that time? I certainly wasn't lagging.

The GMs..well let's not open that can of worms but it wouldn't be fair to say that the entire staff is unfriendly and stuck up, especially since the reviewer probably hadn't even been around long enough to meet them all.

Sucks to be him not having met Aki

[Maiden]

The GMs..well let's not open that can of worms but it wouldn't be fair to say that the entire staff is unfriendly and stuck up, especially since the reviewer probably hadn't even been around long enough to meet them all.

Sucks to be him not having met Aki

[GM-Ayu]

I like the 180 degree turn of events.

if youre complaining that we're making honest reviews, then you should take a look at something called freedom of speech.

What the LW guild disagree with may honestly be what the reviewer thinks of. If you value your own freedom of speech so that you can speak about the server, at least be consistent and let others have their "freedom of speech" about a particular guild in the server.

A server review is a player's personal opinion about their stay in the server, and is certainly not an obligation to review. We like it if players review, but it's not part of a "job." Not reviewing within 1.5 years may at most make the GMs go "=(" but that's about it. Regardless of what "really happen," the review shows that player's thoughts about the review on the different aspects of the server to evaluate on.

How a player may interpret these aspects vary. Inasad treats the /10 scale for server stability to be direct correlation of what % of the time is the server on. I personally lower score for a server in this section if it even lags a bit. How they want to rate us GMs, or server friendliness, that's just up to them.

It's just how the player thinks of the guild inside the server, and any possible relationship of assistance between said guild and the GM team. One player starts a thread that may have implication of 'defending' the GM team against some reviews, and the players who admit to writing those reviews immediately place faults on people. They claim that the "pro-GM" people shouldn't care about it because it is an honest review, their freedom and telling their side of the 'truth.'

Act on your own words, let said player(s) share their personal side of the story and what's their interpretation of the server. If this review frustrates you, welcome to the GM boat?

Less ruckus, less complaints and less drama over this not only serve more good to the server but also to your own guild image. Show the maturity that the guild claims to have that the GMs do not, and don't let these random comments (which the GMs face every day) bother you.

Let the other people decide who they are going to listen to.

[Herman]

One player dominates the ENTIRE community.

cmon guys, thinking caps on...

its obvi JJJ.

you can now applaud my genius.