azurerogue
One Dogma: THROW AD!
Posts: 2,408
Threads: 104
Joined: Aug 2007
|
RE: New MVP Domination Rule
Quote:All of the MVPs are free to be attacked by any player, included MVPs summoned by Quest. However, the first one/first party present at a MvP will be considered the "dominating party." To be present, this means engaging the MvP so that either the player/party are attacking the MvP, or the MvP is attacking (or clearly chasing) that player/party.
Just getting curious now...
If I camp the Ktullanux (or any quest MVP) spawn point with a party, and someone else does the quest, the MVP would aggro on me/my party first. Therefore we're the dominating party, right? So if we decide to Ice Wall Ktull into his spawn point, they're not allowed to interfere because he aggroed on us first, even if they did the quest?
- Albus Dumbledore 99/70 Professor - Albus DumbIedore 92/59 Professor
- AIbus Dumbledore 93/50 Wizard - AIbus DumbIedore 1/1 Novice
- Astaroth 99/70 Creator - Dawkins 99/70 Creator
- Exemplar 98/69 Paladin - Equitas 80/47 Paladin
- Mephistopheles 95/65 Lord Knight - Shogo Kawada 97/67 Stalker
|
|
11-08-2009, 11:42 PM |
|
Ultima_Pi
Queen Bitch of the Universe
Posts: 1,552
Threads: 75
Joined: Nov 2005
|
RE:??New MVP Domination Rule
azurerogue Wrote:If I camp the Ktullanux (or any quest MVP) spawn point with a party, and someone else does the quest, the MVP would aggro on me/my party first.??Therefore we're the dominating party, right???So if we decide to Ice Wall Ktull into his spawn point, they're not allowed to interfere because he aggroed on us first, even if they did the quest?
You're willing to stand that close to him? Or is this some weird Asura-cide thing?
If they use the same strategy (which is...?), then it won't count as interference, according to this rule. They have to purposely attempt to screw it up somehow.
Actually, if the summoning party had any brains, they wouldn't summon at all, but that's besides point.
Marivel, Sidewinder - 99 Lady Sniper
Melody Vilente - 99 High Priestess
Yuugi Hoshiguma - 99 Champion
Gojira Wrote:Your keyboards aren't lightsabers bros...
|
|
11-09-2009, 07:40 AM |
|
Krumb
Lazy Cartographer
Posts: 308
Threads: 16
Joined: Sep 2007
|
RE: New MVP Domination Rule
There are also problems with catching a screen-shot with the correct person causing problems as well.??
-Group summons Ktull
-Random Champ "A" asura's Ktull and teleports away.
-Random Champ "B" walks on screen and watches the group.
-The group, angry at the first asura, takes Screenshots of Champ "B".
-Champ "B" is reported, having done nothing wrong.
Here's the thing, we can put up a hundred if/then situations like the one above, or posted throughout the thread.??The point everyone seems to bring up is a definite rule without loopholes.??I'd be happier if there was a rule stating MvP's aren't FFA, and that's it, than what is being discussed now.??
Do I want that???Heck no, MvP's are competition, there's a reason whomever does the most damage gets MvP and the drops.??If the group hunting an MvP loses it, then they were not fully prepared to handle the competition.
"Don't be a dick"
(This post was last modified: 11-09-2009, 09:25 AM by Krumb.)
|
|
11-09-2009, 09:24 AM |
|
|