Izael Wrote:Because technically that is interfering with the first come, first serve party. Also, if I am allowed to do that, am I now the dominate party? Because the MVP AI will switch aggro to me with no other attacks getting through.
The same thing to ask yourself about:
1) Is the only outcome from whatever you did to prevent other parties to kill the MVP? (No, plus if the other party is also using SG/ME, then they really should be able to SG frequent enough to block whatever as well as a *side effect*)
2) Also I guess it's working on assumption that the other party is also using SG/ME only as their method? From what you said, seems like it's outdamaged thus why switching aggro target to me, which is the point to how the rule works. So it'll be as you said: a mvp is dominated by whoever it's aggroing or chasing down.
@Izael's previous post:
I think now it's down to a matter of preference of why have competition by outdamage only vs competition by anything goes... preferences can't really be defended.
@general heRO:
I don't think the rule will cause as much jailing/muting as everyone described. The only thing it really stops is people doing something intentionally purely to prevent others from being able to attempt MVPing at all, like using ice wall to block other people or pneumaing the mvp when there is no need of it.
We've discussed about the rule again, and if players are having so much doubt about how it works, we don't mind setting a "trial period" for this rule. If it's really shown that the rule causes more outreaching problem than people predicts, we don't mind taking it back. Likewise for players, trust in the GMs after few months of looking at other server's actions on MVPing that this rule isn't something new, and other servers have shown great success in enforcing/judging over this rule (without banning 1/4 of the server or anything like that.)
@Herman
Sad to burst your bubble, but Purple is male