Poll: Should real BG be implemented
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Yes
88.00%
44 88.00%
No
12.00%
6 12.00%
Total 50 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Should Standard Battlegrounds be implemented
Shinibu Offline
Lazy Bum
****

Posts: 510
Threads: 85
Joined: Jul 2009
#1
Should Standard Battlegrounds be implemented
Simple question, should the real BG with woe reductions, 1k HP crystals that take 1 damage per hit, and respawns be implemented on this server?
02-23-2011, 04:36 AM
Find Reply
Eldakar Offline
DevYne SublYme KevYne
*****

Posts: 876
Threads: 26
Joined: Nov 2005
#2
RE: Should Standard Battlegrounds be implemented
Yes and with the randomized team.
Diplomacy is the art of telling people to go to hell in such a way that they ask for directions.

02-23-2011, 04:21 PM
Find Reply
azurerogue Offline
One Dogma: THROW AD!
*****

Posts: 2,408
Threads: 104
Joined: Aug 2007
#3
RE: Should Standard Battlegrounds be implemented
First of all, it's crystals on one map and food storage on the other.??The difference being that crystals are immune to skills (like an emperium that takes 1000 hits to kill) and the food storage is not immune to skills (still one damage from everything, but you can hit it with skills as well).??

And you ask this question as if there's evidence to suggest that we should not have normal BG to begin with. I don't understand, and have never been told, why normal BG was not an option for heRO in the first place. It already has 5v5 matches as a default option.
- Albus Dumbledore 99/70 Professor - Albus DumbIedore 92/59 Professor
- AIbus Dumbledore 93/50 Wizard - AIbus DumbIedore 1/1 Novice
- Astaroth 99/70 Creator - Dawkins 99/70 Creator
- Exemplar 98/69 Paladin - Equitas 80/47 Paladin
- Mephistopheles 95/65 Lord Knight - Shogo Kawada 97/67 Stalker
(This post was last modified: 02-23-2011, 05:00 PM by azurerogue.)
02-23-2011, 04:59 PM
Find Reply
Landon Offline
Snappin necks, Cashin Checks
*****

Posts: 758
Threads: 63
Joined: Jul 2009
#4
RE: Should Standard Battlegrounds be implemented
You know how to solve our PVP problem? Attract players who like to pvp. And you know how to do that? Not buy implementing headgears (lets face it, we have enough), not buy making custom monsters and dungeons (We're lacking when it comes to dungeons anyways). But by doing things that cater to them, buy implementing BG, offering guild packages, advertising as a woe server. Every new players I meet who is interest in WoE on this server leaves after a day when they find out who bad it is. 9 times out of ten I find a player who wants to woe and they're gone the next day.

The problem with normal BG is that I can imagine the big woe guilds abusing it but I mean, BG isn't only for items. But guilds who are interested in parties and having fun would love the friendly competition that BG offers. Sure its abusable but how do you expect people to benefit from the items that BG offers when you can only do it every 3 hours. And by the time you get to make it to BG, you get RANDOMLY chosen so you still might not even make it in, then you get to wait another three hours to get a chance to play.
It helps people get the woe mats that they would normally have to spend hours per week farming and plus its not that bad to do in your spare time, since woe reducts are added, its a good place to get a feel for woe. Why not have this for our server? All people do is complain about how bad it is to prepare for woe and the BG weps are probably the best PVP weps that you can get for a char other than god items and MVP cards. So nows your chance to catch up to those lucky vet's who make woe "horrible for everyone."

The problem I have with this BG is that its pretty much going to be a cloak fest since sins have such a large map to hide on and they'll be waiting it out in the corner until theres one person left or the decide to give up. I can imagine some people taking advantage of that just to mess with people and hinder them from completing it.
SO PLEASE, PLEASE implement the normal BG and see how it works out, thats all we're asking for. Just give it a try and see how it works. Sure the eathena version of BG may be bugged but lots of servers have gotten it a year and a half ago and its running just fine for them. And the best part is, they did it without making its players wait and volunteer for testing. If the GMs want to implement something that they consider BG at least get player feedback before implementing it and if you take out the essential components of BG, don't even bother calling it BG in the first place.


TL;DR

AT LEAST ASK THE PLAYERS WHAT THEY WANT. BG IS GOOD FOR SERVERSSS
Hercules 97 High Priest
Shepard 99 Whitesmith
Hawk 98 Clown
Barossa 97 Professor
(This post was last modified: 02-23-2011, 06:17 PM by Landon.)
02-23-2011, 05:57 PM
Find Reply
Ngjoko Offline
Megaman, not Rockman!!!
*****

Posts: 994
Threads: 25
Joined: Apr 2010
#5
RE: Should Standard Battlegrounds be implemented
Due to time restriction, i can't really do WoE, i do however want to experience it since i have zero experience on it. Having battle grounds should compensate that, although i'd probably be used as a door mat by veterans, but no matter since it's always you kill or killed.
I'm just a social player, but i'd really want to try PvP oriented events or instances. I don't respond to PvP shout outs on main since i never have enough time to prepare for them due to randomness.
I do hope it gets implemented.
I think I'm finally going "home", renewal is fun, but there is really nothing like "heRO"...

Kyarorain, Shield Crusader
Erizabeth, Battle Sage
Derpette, Int Brewer
Katerine, Battle Acolyte
02-23-2011, 07:47 PM
Find Reply
thecursed Offline
The Great Saiyaman!!
*****

Posts: 932
Threads: 90
Joined: Jul 2007
#6
RE: Should Standard Battlegrounds be implemented
Veterans in my opinion deserve to have one of the standardized versions of BG, after all it was approved way back in 2007.
Trowa - Retired Noob

Quoted for truth:
azurerogue Wrote:Players leaving the server (recently) has nothing to do with quests.  We leave because we're bored.  HeRo is an excellent server, and I'm not relocating to a new one - I'm just bored with RO in general and I have way too much going on personally to commit time here.
02-23-2011, 09:26 PM
Find Reply
The Legendary Joe Offline
Raging Alt-a-holic
*****

Posts: 3,691
Threads: 255
Joined: Mar 2007
#7
RE: Should Standard Battlegrounds be implemented
I have never tried the official BG. As such, I can safely say: I don't know.
02-24-2011, 12:55 PM
Find Reply
Frankasm Offline
Alicia and I...together forever
**

Posts: 25
Threads: 9
Joined: Feb 2011
#8
RE: Should Standard Battlegrounds be implemented
Greatly over powered gears. No thanks.
[Image: idh9x3.jpg]
-------------------------------------------------------
Kensei - Champion
Kensou - Soul Linker
Aubraxis - Creator
Dripht - Professor
-Apollo- - Clown
Driphtous - High Priest
Dripther - Sniper
Devotion of Alicia - Crusader
Baraxcus- Super Novice
Keiichi Maebara - Gunslinger
02-26-2011, 01:17 AM
Find Reply
Shikari Offline
Br?
*****

Posts: 1,956
Threads: 50
Joined: Jun 2009
#9
RE: Should Standard Battlegrounds be implemented
BG gears arent OP, they mostly only increase/decrease dmg on demi human, thus theyre only for pvp and woe, and the couple of demi-human monsters, AND they're accessible to everyone so its not like people could really complain about not having them, AND they would help smaller guilds start woeing since they'll have decent gears.
[Image: 2wnxvtw.png]

Proud Member of Desolation of Eden
05-15-2011, 12:41 PM
Find Reply
Elements Offline
Member
***

Posts: 65
Threads: 5
Joined: Mar 2011
#10
RE: Should Standard Battlegrounds be implemented
didnt some gm say that the usual bg cant be implemented, due to our current SVN? It has also been stated somewhere, that once its possible, the other maps get implemented, and randomized.

the current Schedule kind of BG is totally fine, if you ask me.
[Image: 88c809e550.gif]
05-15-2011, 12:58 PM
Find Reply


Forum Jump: