Whispers
from the Abyss
    
Posts: 1,985
Threads: 133
Joined: Oct 2007
|
Alice in Wonderland!!!!
I just got back and omfg it is awesome!??xD
Also, I'd suggest seeing it in 3D.??There are no "WHOOOOOOA IT'S COMING AT YOU OUT OF THE SCREEN!!" moments, so seeing it in 2D won't ruin any particular scenes for you.??There are moments which make use of the 3D - such as when Alice first enters Underland (yes, Underland - see it and this will make sense to you ) and there are glowy things (like pollen or just general fantasy-land glowy things) floating in the air.??The 3D projects some of these glowy thingies into the theater.??The same is done with other worldly effects throughout the movie.??All-in-all, while being done very well, the 3D is very subtle which I enjoyed.??I hate it when 3D is done either cheaply (having only two layers with the object of attention in the foreground/focus and everything else on a background layer/out of focus) and/or they abuse it and do they whole "OMG IT'S COMING OUT AT YOU - PHEAR!!" thing.??X_x
Rather, watching Alice was like sitting in a [giant] room in which a wall was removed and beyond it was Wonderland.
As far as everything else goes - plot, characters, et cetera - I won't even mention to avoid spoilage.??^_^
Well, I will say that Professor Snape as the blue caterpillar was well-played.??I'm the only one who caught it and I had to jump on IMDB to prove it to everyone else!??xD
<--[awesome] Nerd
|
|
| 03-21-2010, 04:35 PM |
|
mahawirasd
Posting Freak
    
Posts: 3,839
Threads: 50
Joined: Jul 2008
|
RE: Alice in Wonderland!!!!
[SPOILER and WALL OF TEXT alert]
well i saw it a couple of weeks ago... although i must confess i enjoyed the eye candy, the story left a lot to be desired...
acting was nondescript. Even the hatter, from whom i expected much, can't seem to shake off his crazy pirate's strides, willy-wonka's facial expression, and edward's hand movements. Sure they grow on you, sure they're remarkable, but this just leaves the Hatter with an empty character...
The only actor worth mentioning imho is Helena... she tends to overdo things, but it fits exactly with the Red Queen's shoes, or shall i say hats?
Even the white queen looked queer and distant. Her other movies seem to make most use of her ditzy hopeless facial expressions. But in a movie such as Alice where all the make up and graphics are superfluous, an actor has to provide real character for it to show. And she failed. Horribly.
And i must say that although the message they tried to convey is a good one, the way and the tone of telling it is out of place. It becomes too preachy and judgmental... And although the illusion of "choice" was preserved, it still failed to give Alice enough time to think over and contemplate properly. The meetings with the caterpillar was good, but perhaps not enough of such wisdom/revelation moments are given in the movie...
-w-
|
|
| 03-21-2010, 10:07 PM |
|
Whispers
from the Abyss
    
Posts: 1,985
Threads: 133
Joined: Oct 2007
|
RE: Alice in Wonderland!!!!
There's no spoilers in your post.
But there ARE spoilers in here.
Don't say you weren't warned!
Anywho - yeah, I caught Jack Sparrow in the Hatter a couple of times, but I think you list the other characters simply because they are his biggest creations.??What of Sweeney Todd, John Dillinger, Ichabod Crane, Gilbert Grape or his characters from From Hell, Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas, Blow or Once Upon a Time in Mexico???Of course we saw them.??Those are all Johnny Depp.??In the same we saw Johnny Depp in all of his characters.
Do you not think Lethal Weapon or Goodfellas when you see Joe Pesci???LoL
I think the White Queen was kind of odd, but I feel her second scene (or first if you don't include the Hatter's flashback) saves her when she runs to the dog after finding she is safe from her entourage to act without her "majestic movements" - if you will.??That makes it kind of obvious that she acts that way out of necessity to her subjects so as to exude her queenliness.??The opposite is found in the red queen's entourage with their prostheticly-enlarged aggregates.??Perhaps there is a message there, hmm???
Aside, the White Queen was supposed to be queer and distant in that she was carefree and peaceful (and a denizen of Underland).??LoL
I don't like to read into things, though.??When I was a kid in English class at grammar school they taught us to read into the "theme" of a book.??"What is the theme of the book, Christopher?"
Hell, I don't know.??I just enjoyed the story and took what I wanted when I wanted it.??Plus, anything can be looked at a million ways.??One could read into Tim Burton's Alice in Wonderland as sexist since Alice doesn't get married and becomes a business woman.
Is it sexist???More than likely not - she's independent and slays the Jabberwocky - the exact opposite ideals of what it means to be sexist.??LoL
My point is that reading into the "theme" of things runs the risk of barring someone from a good story.??I liked Alice in Wonderland despite what it may have been trying to teach people.??I doubt it was trying to teach anything.??It's just a story about a girl who is put into a very difficult situation then falls down a rabbit hole to find herself in an even more difficult situation and, with the help of some unlikely friends, finds her way out of all these predicaments.??
I still think it should have been longer for better development, though.??=/
|
|
| 03-21-2010, 10:49 PM |
|
|