Ban list

[GM-Ayu]

I found that one, but at the same time, Fainn is also the surname for an Irish family, originated from Dublin according to some website of some sort. Our report of offense against Fainn was based on this spelling vs Fainn as well. I didn't dive deeper across languages for Fainn. I only tried to find it in English, and didn't find any results, and went along with how Fainn is the bypass for the 'alternate spelling.'

I found this only awhile ago and posted it in GM forums for his case. I'll wait to see what other GMs think about it if it is a genuine coincidence to be similar spelling with another word, or not. Let's leave this one until tomorrow morning when other GMs wake up.

<><><>

As for the other name definition, Kiki we pointed out the link because we deemed the material as inappropriate for that of heRO, which includes heRO forum as well. We did not directly quote the messages in heRO for this reason. I'll PM you about it instead of public posting, ok?

<><><>

If you did no wrong, there's nothing people can report you on. GM is equally bounded by our own set of rules for heRO in terms of what we can do, what we can't do and what we will stop others to do.

<><><>

Have GMs considered what sort of card is LoA and what will happen to heRO server as a whole now? Yes we have.

Economy will suffer massive inflation due to a severe lost of treasure boxes from castle that would've provided sources of high demand equipment. If LoA even shrinks, we (as in heRO server) lose some more people who are contributing to item hunts that will affect economy once again. LoA plays a certain role in our server's WoE. Some people said it's great competition, some say that LoA is so strong that it's not healthy. Whichever view you take about their power/influence in WoE, it will affect you if you are a frequent visitor of pvp or WoE. LoA makes up a quite significant portion of server population, being one of the very few guilds who made sister guilds because the original guild extension limit is just not enough.

... So? It doesn't have any effect of rulings of these individual players. We gathered up all the acts of rulebreaking at once, together with reports that accumulated for quite awhile (as stated by GM Auron), and did it all at once regardless of which guild they came from. In this cleanup, there is someone from another guild too hm?

<><><>

I did bring the question to the other GMs before: what if there is a need of guild leadership for LoA change as a direct or indirect result of this? We decided that we will do what we did for another guild in the past to be consistent and fair. We will switch guild leadership to someone else to continue to lead the guild.