Difference between revisions of "User talk:Circe"
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
--[[User:Sylmeria|Sylmeria]] 18:57, 17 March 2012 (UTC) | --[[User:Sylmeria|Sylmeria]] 18:57, 17 March 2012 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | Sorry for bothering you again, but could you add a minor thing in the css? | ||
+ | |||
+ | Just a .table { | ||
+ | background:none | ||
+ | } | ||
+ | |||
+ | Tables with no specification have a white background, you must specify it to be blank, and invisible tables are useful for some things, and its better if they are kept simpler. [and you can just specify a background for them normally if you want to, which will override the none] | ||
+ | |||
+ | --[[User:Sylmeria|Sylmeria]] 23:20, 17 March 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:20, 17 March 2012
Umm... I'm wondering why this wiki doesn't have some parser functions? such as if.
Is it disabled or something? If this is a wiki from mediawiki, I'm sure I'm using the right coding, but instead of being hidden like a code should, it just displays as text on the page.
Edit: It seems this version of mediwiki is too old and doesn't come with it. Here's the page that tells how to install it: link Sylmeria 14:49, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
Also, I've added this template, if you wouldn't mind checking the candidates for deletion category once in a while to delete any duplicated files (a lot of images are in .jpg, and you can't update them with another format, just create a new file). I'm not sure what exactly are the policies here about deletion, so sorry if you'd rather keep them/not have the template, but I don't think its any good to keep unused files all around.
--Sylmeria 18:27, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
I see... What you can do with a template gets very limited without those, hope he updates it soon.
Well, a lot of them are very bad jpg quality images (and personally, I see a lot of image degradation, considering how the original could have been, anyways, you can see the artifacts in many of them, while you can save jpg in a fairly decent quality, many of them definitely aren't), and personally, if I'm to put better ones (which I want to), I'll do so in png, so that will have them be separated/duplicated. For the monster ones and so on specially, since jpg doesn't have transparency.
I'm sorry if this sounds rude or anything, its definitely not the intention, but I really don't see why/don't want to leave quality behind, and jpg is terrible to preserving the image.
--Sylmeria 18:57, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
Sorry for bothering you again, but could you add a minor thing in the css?
Just a .table { background:none }
Tables with no specification have a white background, you must specify it to be blank, and invisible tables are useful for some things, and its better if they are kept simpler. [and you can just specify a background for them normally if you want to, which will override the none]
--Sylmeria 23:20, 17 March 2012 (UTC)