Guild Tax cap increase?

[Motenai_Ronin]

Jagger...you're just fishing now.

God...I wish there was a /facepalm emote. How does allowing people (or noobs as you call them) to level guilds easier automatically = that WoE will suffer? How do you reach that conclusion?

I would think that more guilds would mean more people WoEing...which would lead to a much more intense WoE. Yet by your logic, WoE will suffer if more people participate?

I agree with this 100%

and before you fish for more or bring up mandatory taxing again...

my guild, Geonosis is probably one of the oldest running still active guilds on Hero Mkay? I was around when LW wasn't even off the ground, big names like LoA were still duking it out and making drama, Bloody was still amassing his l33tness, and even now my guild isn't half the level of guild's that have been here a week. Does this make my guild any less of a guild?

If I chose early on to impose a mandatory tax, do you think I'd have a stable reputation, or folks would want to be in my guild at all, seeing as we're not WoE ready.

But I chose instead to tax myself to level the guild, and if I'd rather 100% tax myself than tax everyone else 1% that's my choice.

So increasing the guild tax cap would prop more guilds up into that beefy level range where WoE guilds fall (76/76 capacity)??Geonosis is still at max of 46 btw. Btw; I've always found increasing capacity to suffer the most from the principle of diminishing returns.

Now perhaps woe-ing has nothing to do with how many people fit in one guild, most woeing parties aren't more than 10 people (arbitrary number)

Well you want more intense woe right? Start funneling social guild members into a hybrid social / WoE guild, that would be helped by a higher tax cap in increasing its capacity, so you can see more intense woes.