Snapplewee
¥Snapple¥
Posts: 1,086
Threads: 108
Joined: Feb 2007
|
RE: New castles for woe
They got the castle by a fluke anyway
|
|
04-04-2008, 07:23 PM |
|
Bloody
Mmm Blood
Posts: 2,124
Threads: 205
Joined: Mar 2007
|
RE: New castles for woe
Wow just wow.. I demand a compensation of the time I spent reading this utterly dumb topic.
Snapple and teOx, you do realize both of you look like idiots arguing about this, don't you?
1- You have no real reason to argue about.
2- The arrangement was 50% investment split between both guilds. Amara was taking the zeny for the zeny she ALREADY invested. As in if she invested on 1st, 2nd and 3rd April, and WoE was on the 4th April, she'd take the zeny AFTER WoE for the 1st, 2nd and 3rd of April, at the same time she gives 50% of what items she got on those days. In English-for-idiots: You invest and get items at once.
3- If you say we didn't get our worth of investment I'll shoot you. How many OCAs and god items did we get? kthxbai
4- The people that invested the most zeny were Averan and I. I threw more than 20mil alone, am I whining about breaking the alliance?
5- Would you rather if Behe broke the alliance and someone else took + Held pront with it's econ? Yeah we are good, we have the greatest gears on the server, but if 2 or 3 guilds decided to ally and attack us.. Numbers > Skill.
6- We took Pront first, and we lost it after a few minutes. Behemoth took it and held it since that day. If you want to talk all big and mighty, how come we lost it first?
7- Grow up and go get ready for Sunday's WoE.
No other LW member need to whine because there is no real reason to complain, so just zip it and move on.
(This post was last modified: 04-05-2008, 01:04 AM by Bloody.)
|
|
04-05-2008, 12:59 AM |
|
GM-Pandora
Admin Extraordinaire
Posts: 14,774
Threads: 703
Joined: Sep 2005
|
RE: New castles for woe
+1 to Bloody and thanks to Amara for clearing it up.
We never asked anyone to release a castle, like we're not going to ask any Geffen/Alde castle owner either, if they come to us and ask then we'll proceed with changes.
I find that saying the castle belonged to an alliance is being technical, not the other way around.
If we started looking at alliance and political woe situation to decide to switch castle or not then we would be getting unfair, most of the GMs don't woe anyway, the relationship between guilds and such is not our business to interfere in. We never asked any guild to release castle or break any alliance even if we found them to be overpowered, all we have influence in is what our own characters do.
I should be able to make it sunday, hope some of the other GMs can too, let's have a fun woe in the fresh castle.
|
|
04-05-2008, 10:32 AM |
|
|