+- heRO-Server Forum (https://www.pandoraonline.net/forum)
+-- Forum: Game Related (https://www.pandoraonline.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Suggestions/Questions (https://www.pandoraonline.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=19)
+--- Thread: New castles for woe (/showthread.php?tid=3952)
RE: New castles for woe - Général_Argos - 04-04-2008
Aaronock Wrote:Well, um...wow...?
Behemoth owns the castle, they do with it what they want, I fail to see what the problem is?
They have it because of us defending. Eco is high because we helped investing also. Now they make a decision like if they were the only responsible of the castle.
Snapple, I think you should redirect your anger toward behemoth instead of the gms here.
RE: New castles for woe - The Legendary Joe - 04-04-2008
Personally, as I've stated in other posts, which may or may not have been public, I welcome this change. While the loots from having the eco are a nice bonus, only things I really care about is guild storage and access to the guild dungeons.
Neither of which require a lot of eco, and it's boring doing the same run over and over and over again. We need new terrain
RE: New castles for woe - Aaronock - 04-04-2008
Well, that's something you guys sound like you need to work out. That's also a risk you take having allies, they can do things you won't like.
But at the same time, I stand by what I said.
RE: New castles for woe - Lysander - 04-04-2008
*cough* heh, I didnt read the whole 'The owner of the castle PMs Pandora about it thing' I apologizes and fully support this!
RE: New castles for woe - Crimson - 04-04-2008
owned
RE: New castles for woe - GM-Pandora - 04-04-2008
It's ok Lysander, I guess I should have been clearer ^_^;
Ayu stated the condition of castle changing, after sunday only geffen and alde will fit those, until an owner decides they want a change.
RE: New castles for woe - teOx - 04-04-2008
krim: They have it because of us defending. Eco is high because we helped investing also. Now they make a decision like if they were the only responsible of the castle.
Snapple, I think you should redirect your anger toward behemoth instead of the gms here.
--------------------------------------
+1
so this was behemoths idea of an alliance...
ill remember this.
RE: New castles for woe - Izael - 04-04-2008
G?n?ral_Argos Wrote:Aaronock Wrote:Well, um...wow...?
Behemoth owns the castle, they do with it what they want, I fail to see what the problem is?
They have it because of us defending. Eco is high because we helped investing also. Now they make a decision like if they were the only responsible of the castle.
Snapple, I think you should redirect your anger toward behemoth instead of the gms here.
Yes, the eco is high, and you helped us defend. You helped us invest, although we, behemoth, did invest more. But you were rewarded with that. You got half the drops from the castle. So I'm not sure why you're complaining now that the alliance is over that we want to do something with our castle.
Really, we know we can't defend the castle against the whole server, so why should we just hand it over? Isn't it a better tactical decision to destroy the eco?
And also, wouldn't a change of scenery be nice? Everyone's been fighting in that castle for a while now. I think a new castle will be refreshing.
RE: New castles for woe - Snapplewee - 04-04-2008
I think Behemoth won't know what castle eco is for the rest of their heRO life.
RE: New castles for woe - Snapplewee - 04-04-2008
The only anger I have toward the GM's is allowing such a stupid rule.
But, I'm glad they've upheld the rules and not made any exceptions.
My anger with Behemoth cannot be put into words.