+- heRO-Server Forum (https://www.pandoraonline.net/forum)
+-- Forum: Game Related (https://www.pandoraonline.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Suggestions/Questions (https://www.pandoraonline.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=19)
+--- Thread: New castles for woe (/showthread.php?tid=3952)
RE: New castles for woe - ZackFireblade - 04-04-2008
my my...is that how you want to represent LW, Snapple and teox? with threats and ranting?
Izael has already pointed out that LW and Behemoth are no longer allies, so what Behemoth decides to do with their castle from this point on really has nothing to do with you.
Furthermore, while yes, LW helped defend that castle, perhaps you should remember that 1) LW was given a fair share of the loot, so they were compensated. 2) Behemoth was defending, too. Stop pretending that you were the only ones doing any work.
If Behemoth's guild leader has decided to change the castle in order to keep WoE more balanced and interested, I stand by that decision with all the support I can offer. Meanwhile, you decide to whine like spoiled prepubescents whose parents didn't buy them some toy.
So, in teox's own words: "I'll remember this"
RE: New castles for woe - Snapplewee - 04-04-2008
You guys would've fallen so fast.
Even if LW didn't attack you, you would have had no chance.
This isn't a thread for that discussion though, just bring it.
(BTW, do you remember you guys always whining about being bored? Hmm, wonder why that was)
RE: New castles for woe - thecursed - 04-04-2008
this is expected with Apoc and others not there to WoE and ally against...the alliance then breaks. Behemoth knows LW will take it from them so they made a smart move. good job Behemoth.
and @ snapple teox or any other LW that think this is unfair. i dont know the unallying details or who unallied who. but i assume it was either mutual or LW desided to unally. in this case behemoth could do whatever they wanted with that castle and they did the best possible thing they could. on the other hand if Behemoth unallied LW without warning and burned the castles eco..i could see you being mad, however if thats not the case then suck it up and remake the castles eco.
RE: New castles for woe - Snapplewee - 04-04-2008
They broke with us Trowa.
RE: New castles for woe - thecursed - 04-04-2008
well...it was bound to happen sometime. Apocalypse got out of the 3 way alliance on that castle for those reasons. that and the sides were unfair.
RE: New castles for woe - Snapplewee - 04-04-2008
We also understood that the alliance with Apoc had 1 purpose, and once the purpose was achieved, it would break.
RE: New castles for woe - Avogadro - 04-04-2008
Just to clarify things, as I hear them, there was discussion about breaking the alliance, there was not discussion about what to do with the castle.
RE: New castles for woe - Nidsrule - 04-04-2008
Snaps, if you want to rant, go do so in the guild forum. I don't see why you find this so surprising.
RE: New castles for woe - Snapplewee - 04-04-2008
If you get on MSN I'd be happy to tell you why it is.
RE: New castles for woe - thecursed - 04-04-2008
the alliance between Apoc and LW served its purpose and could have had a future but the sides were uneven. and when sides are uneven people leave and the allies are bent against themselves...this has pretty much happened here