Is server down???

[Ange]

I blame aliens.

[ChaosPrince]

Before anyone start any drama, I want to point this out:
I havn't disconnected from the server since this afternoon till WoE time...

When WoE started 21h00 EST (server time), I used "/w" command and it says 306 players online, mostly vendors??). With 0 resistance, I have the 3 castles. Here's the issue:

I don't think it's fair to own a castle without competition. I don't think the guilds who were owning them should get extra chest by building on economy due to untouched WoE. However, I don't think it's fair for me to grab them because the odds are on my side (I got the chance to WoE). Here are my propositions: (poll)

A) Everybody trust me, I will not touch the castle loots. Fair?;
B) GMs grab the loots/or take the castles from me/ or castle rotation;
C) No body gives a dam thing because you all just don't care...

Please, give your opinions without "QQ'ing" or starting "drama".
ps: @21h23 EST, I was disconnected, and unable to reconnect...

Thank you.

[tan313008]

Or how bout rollback if its not any trouble :D

[ChaosPrince]

I just thought of... if RMS is right (Aka if the server was really "offline), it would probly mean that it didn't take in consideration (or save) the events that happened... Aka me lvling/questing for nameless on alt sin+capping castles = cancelled.

[sir bubbles]

[Deviluke]

If A LARGE MAJORITY OF PEOPLE were not able to log on for WoE I would HOPE that there would be some kind of roll back (for the WoE time only) to replace any eco you broke and return the castles to their previous owners since you were some miracle child who was able to log on. Especially when Glyph couldn't even log on and said WoE would PROBABLY be called off.

Secondly if you don't care and think it's unfair to own a castle with 0 opposition then why would you even go through the trouble of breaking them in the first place? Why not just leave it how it is if you think it's so unfair instead of breaking them and then offering ideas on how to appease us? lol You sound like a jerk saying you don't care/think it's unfair but that you broke em anyway just cuz you could. No offense ofc. ;x

Edit: If it's so "unfair" for people to keep building eco because their castles would have been "untouched" if not for you. How is it fair for you to decide to eco break them to make them have to replace what you broke? What if their castle WOULDN'T have been touched with them online then wow you just got a cool -5 eco on them that WOULDN'T HAVE HAPPENED if they were online. How wonderful for you to determine how to handle this for us. =D

Seriously, if this sticks, regarding what Chaos did to the WoE castles, I'ma be hella pissed cuz that's just not right considering the majority, if not all of us, were unable to log in for WoE...

[sir bubbles]

What Deviluke said.

[Fabre]

well, im sure cp woulda broke them all atleast once, ea. hes usually really good about that, so no harm there. unless he logged other guilded characters to break eco they are only one down ea. btw cp under the sircumstance how does it feal to be like doe.? lol you know unstoppable. lol.
luvs.

[Deviluke]

Excuse me but what planet do you live on? lol

Chaos doesn't break every castle 1x each WoE, seriously. lol If you're gonna reply you could at least make a valid claim? So yeah there is harm there. And comparing someone taking all 3 castles with 0 opposition doesn't exactly put them on the same level as DoE, cuz ya know, they usually have opposition. Just sayin. ^ ^

[azurerogue]

Seriously, this is shitty if it doesn't get undone.