Change Sight & Ruwatch to normal

[Former-GM-Altheridos]

by doing that, another skill become useless,*sightrasher*

[Sekaru]

.... sightblaster is supposed to be what makes up for low sight range.. so yeah... no comment other then that..

[Flossy]

I say leave it alone, come on Really how many attacks will it take to kill a wizard, Seriously Not many...

[poeticwings]

Well now, I have an assassin, a priest, and a wizard. o_o

Honestly, I was working with a sin to test the range for sight and I must say it's too big, but then again, without backup in situations such as WoE, wizards would be dead and the said rogue-sin could just cloak again. Sorry if i'm underestimating Wizards. But then again, there IS A SIGHT CLIP. Seriously, anyone can use that. So maybe just change the ratio of the sight on the sight clip. o_O? Is that even possible?

But then there is a problem with FS priests that can be in the scene longer than the Energizer bunny can beat that drum. It would definitely be hard to get past ruwatch. Rogue-sins cannot use their skills to their full potiential.

How about for WoE, we have an area around the emp with no ruwatch/sight/hide/cloak. People use ruwatch and sight near walls and warps anyway. Most cloakers would be seen right away. AND people need to uncloak to attack the emp. Sheesh.

As for regular PVP, I have no suggestions.

[Kadar]

First off a compromise doesn't seem like a good idea to me. I see this as a all or nothing type of deal. Either bring it all the way back to official range or keep it as is and screw over sins and rogues. Without ED, Marc, or silence wizards are a pain to kill. The current range of sight means they basically get a free frostdiver or stone curse in. That means death to most classes. Even more so to low mdef classes like sins and rogues. Killing a wiz to get rid of sight is still much more of a possibility than killing a priest. This means that only lowering sight won't do much good because ruwach is still out there and more or less unavoidable. Priests won't go down without EDP or a failure of some sort on their end. Then of course monks also get ruwach. With the current range of ruwach it's basically impossible to attack an attentive monk without being TSS'd or Asura'd before you even get to them. I still see no reason for the extra range on sight and ruwach.

During WoE with the current range of sight and ruwach people don't even need to be using it near the door. They can stand way off, in some cases behind a wall and still have sight and ruwach effecting the portal. That is in no sense fair.

[Salvosa]

Just because my ideas weren't any good doesn't mean we can't come up with a good comprimise.

[Kadar]

I don't think we should compromise. In my opinion skills should always mirror official.

[ShadesOfBlue]

off subject a little bit but i remember when geos used to have firebolt skill and seals crit'ed like crazy for high damage

[Yanos]

i vote : no opignon

i played on the serv a lomg time ago & i not see the range up of that 2 skill & if people play well u can snake

[Flossy]

"Without ED, Marc, or silence *wizards are a pain to kill*."

Really ? one sonic blow obliterates a wizard's hp with out one of those... seriously try a wiz you have around 3k hp with no vit/hp cards...Its really stupid trying to make a wizard weaker than they already are...seriously just leave it be...

Even if some one has a Horong card, (Which not alot of people do) They are first targeted anyway...