im going to state this calmly
. i just hope my points wont be ignored like machi's always are in his crime and punishment thread. (people respond only to what they want right? =\)
Why is LW mad? Im shocked to see people suprised at our reaction. Behemoth's "tactical" move was very underhanded. Here are hard facts: we allied them, they broke the LoA castle so we defended with them for many weeks. We paid half (or what we thought was half. dont even try to say we paid less than half izael. did you guys make us pay less than half just so you can say that lol? more underhandedness, thats damn shady) of the eco price. We helped them with gears, we invited them into our forums to further trust and communications. Personally i started to see behemoth as friendly faces, always doing my alchemist business with hibiki and helping everyone marionette to make pots. I thought of them as friends, but apparently to the behemoth leaders LW was just a force to keep close to you until you can find the opportunity to screw them over.
So basically we took the castle together, raised the castle together, defended the castle together (even though LW spent far more resources) and shared the castle drops together. This was OUR castle, the only reason LW went elsewhere was for guild dungeon access. Suddenly Behemoth makes a decision like its their own castle. Amara, is this why you wanted to break the alliance? because you already had this whole plot set up?
To GMs: you have to understand while this was behemoth's castle by possession, it was in reality a castle belonging to an alliance. Dont get technical with me and say that the flag says behemoth's name on it, that is bullshit to LW and all of the members who paid millions to defend and raise the economy. the ONLY reason it is behemoth's castle is because it was a behemoth player that took it in the beginning. If it had been an LW player, we still would have split gears and eco down the middle. It is an ALLIANCE castle. It is perfectly understandable that GMs ask the owner of the castle for permission to change castles, but after learning the true story and that it wasnt only their castle I think morally GMs should reverse the decision. There is a perfectly harmless castle at geffen with 0 eco that would be a far more reasonable choice for a castle switch. At the risk of stepping out of line, i think allowing this change would be a shady, underhanded move on the GM team's part. Its a decision that throws away the hard work of more than 20 LW players. Ill say one more time for emphasis, it was not behemoth's castle. If you want to do this based on a technicality, that is only more proof of underhandedness.
to everyone else: Dont act suprised by our reaction. we were shafted and behemoth's move was shady. Youd be pissed too after spending all that time and money on a castle only to find out your "ally" was planning to throw it away without telling you. thanks for your time.
