pnutbuttajelly
PBJ > AMJ
Posts: 309
Threads: 14
Joined: Sep 2010
|
RE:??Reduce castles in woe to 1
Cerberus Wrote:Seriously i doubt this whole server knows what WoE stands for and ppl should rlly stop talking about stuff they dont know about, this server is dying and no one can deny that, i USED to have fun in this server with woe and all the like, now thanks for the 3rd castle this was just a castle camping with 0 fights, too many ppl including me are just thinking on quitting this server for real cuz this server rlly dosent give a damn about woe but to custom hats and stuff in the like for social ppl (lol...)
My name is pnutbuttajelly. I am from Behemoth and I second this motion.
PS: Remember I made a 10 page rant thread about this guys?^_^ Guess who were the ones other than me/Landon who posted in there. Non-serious KoJers and non-WoEers. As stupid as it may have sounded, I didn't rant about the server dying because it was just a moment in my head - pretty sure that EVERY SERIOUS CONTENDER OF WOE ON THIS SERVER IS AGREEING THAT WOE SUCKS AND THE SERVER IS DYING. The undeniable fact that there are good players on heRO leaving or are on the verge of leaving, and nothing being done about it is just depressing.
Quote:Will says:
If they ever tell my story, let them say I walked with giants. Men rise and fall like the winter wheat, but these names will never die. Let them say I lived in the time of Proto, raper of noobs. Let them say, I lived, In the time, Of Pnut.
|
|
10-27-2011, 06:57 PM |
|
pnutbuttajelly
PBJ > AMJ
Posts: 309
Threads: 14
Joined: Sep 2010
|
RE: ??Reduce castles in woe to 1
Snowhawk Wrote:No its really not.??Even when I was with Behemoth, I was pulled to a Mid rate server so the guy that was teaching me to WoE could teach me through a "real" WoE.??Low Rate WoE's are shadows of what they could be.??Mid and High Rate ones are a lot harder and more fun than what we have ever had on here.
Wow. Are you aware that there aren't enough words in the english language- hell, the entire lexicon of languages the world over- to describe how incredibly wrong this is. Not only is it wrong in that it is ignorant, but in that it is so incredibly incorrect on a factual level. Holy fucking God, how stupid can a human being get? In my life I've encountered people who have been unintelligent, yes- I've encountered my share of people who suffered from mental disabilities. People with downs syndrome, autism, and so on. However, I have never once encounted somehow so stupid as to be capable of thinking something so unbelievably off-base. I didn't even think it possible that anyone in our plain of existence could ever even have the capacity for this level of idiocy.
Quote:Will says:
If they ever tell my story, let them say I walked with giants. Men rise and fall like the winter wheat, but these names will never die. Let them say I lived in the time of Proto, raper of noobs. Let them say, I lived, In the time, Of Pnut.
|
|
10-27-2011, 07:36 PM |
|
Mara
Self Titled Goddess
Posts: 221
Threads: 12
Joined: Jun 2009
|
RE: ??Reduce castles in woe to 1
Snowhawk Wrote:No its really not.??Even when I was with Behemoth, I was pulled to a Mid rate server so the guy that was teaching me to WoE could teach me through a "real" WoE.??Low Rate WoE's are shadows of what they could be.??Mid and High Rate ones are a lot harder and more fun than what we have ever had on here.
As for dying...3 people leaving while there are still 25+ People playing...oh yes its dying alright.??Maybe it'll close down in another 4 years after the server gains like 50 more people.
Seriously man, I'm not one to insult (yes, i do type some vulgar post, but its the only way some people really understand a point), but what comes out of your fingertips is just sad. Only reason it's a "good" woe, is because there are a bunch of people, but they're mostly noobs that power leveled so fast they never really got a chance to learn the in and outs of the job they play. Might as well give everyone access to the test server and have everyone woe with an absurd amount of consumables, because that's a "real" WoE.
Also, do you even go to WoE? Have you seen the amount of people NOT SEEN in woe? Do you know WHO is missing in each guild? Do you know what were the starting numbers on each guild and what are the current ones? Answer me those questions and i'll dignify you with a reply.
Mara: 9x/50 Soul Linker
Mami: +89/50 Priest <3
Lind: 9x/6x Champion
Urtool: 9x/5x Creator - Paz: 99 Lif
Noob Behind A Bow: hurr/durr DERP DERP
|
|
10-27-2011, 07:41 PM |
|
Session
Formerly known as Tak.
Posts: 2,023
Threads: 105
Joined: Jul 2009
|
RE: Reduce castles in woe to 1
If only we could snag some of those populace of those mid/high rate servers. Oh wait, they'd be pretty horrible and apt to quit quick on such a 'hard' server.
Would be nice to have more people though; for WoE but especially outside of it.
@Gojira: I know the once I played 2.0 was on a third class server, but it felt more 'realistic' in a sense of skirmishes happening beyond just passerby conflicts on the way to the Emp room. I liked it, but even there the one guild with all the shit (Had been left over from a server wipe with ALL their gear/characters intact- and I mean the good shit...) pretty much held off the first layer, and we only broke through after I went on a rampage with my Genetic and killed the spear spamming rune knight.
Wondered a while now why 2.0 hasn't been suggested. It sounds like it'd be quite the balancing insert, seeing as the 'top' guilds would be forced to the forefront of the battle, and with that sort of exposure and a bit or promise- it may prompt more people to attack, even if but to trololo a bit. Each little counts, I suppose.
Anyways, I know from the past couple months like nobody on hero wants to WoE. If they do, they're in a guild- but 6/10 people are like, "I don't want to join a guild." Why? "I don't like pvp." I'm not a serious woe person, but I've found myself wanting to at least try; and thus picked up non trans when time permits. Its fun, even though I'm a newbie at it.
|
|
10-27-2011, 07:42 PM |
|
|