SwiftStrike
teh fuh.
Posts: 439
Threads: 41
Joined: Nov 2005
|
RE: Lower Alde drops or Rid of Alde.
I have to say, finally someone that posted something that made sense, and isn't flawed, anyways like you said it is still alot harder to protect.
I <3 u
EDIT in response:
Builds are changed, vit is something that is really not pushed as much in non-trans woe as it is in trans woe, look at the hammerfall that I heard protected woe for 2 hours? I'f Im going to make a char it would be a sin (to throw my gears on him as you said), and sending a pvm sin (because ill be leveling him) with 0 vit into a spammerfall is not gonna make it, now send my sinx, and spammerfall barely affects me more than 2 seconds, also remember added resistance to stun, alot better def and a much better build.
(This post was last modified: 06-11-2007, 09:55 PM by SwiftStrike.)
|
|
06-11-2007, 09:45 PM |
|
Général_Argos
Removed by GM
Posts: 3,012
Threads: 144
Joined: Jan 2006
|
RE: Lower Alde drops or Rid of Alde.
The only people doing the non-trans woe at aldebaran are legendary warriors. The only people attaking them are LoA and MG guilds. I made MG guild only to get rid of high eco 4 free for non-trans but I don't feel like playing it anymore. Me, ehaltar and Sir Aun have made the "just make a non-trans character thing" for alde woe but what we got is our main guild GS, being "destroyed" because no one in it doing the main-real-woe. Alde castle only benefit 1 guild and they seem to be the only who wants that castle or, want it with full eco.
IGN: 9000KRIM Alts: Morradin, KRIMSTEAL
Banned: Krimlin, Krimlogas, Lord_Krimlogas, General_Argos
Krim's grocery list
¯_¯_¯_¯_¯_¯_¯_¯_¯_¯_¯_¯_¯_ -KRIMLIN-¯_¯_¯_¯_¯_¯_¯_¯_¯_¯_¯_¯_¯_¯/
Murphy law. The only true one.
(This post was last modified: 06-11-2007, 10:28 PM by Général_Argos.)
|
|
06-11-2007, 10:27 PM |
|
|