Snapplewee
¥Snapple¥
Posts: 1,086
Threads: 108
Joined: Feb 2007
|
RE: New castles for woe
WHY DOES THE OWNER DECIDE?
Why don't you talk to the rest of the server?
Ridiculous
I'll send you a PM so you're not in the dark.
|
|
04-04-2008, 10:51 AM |
|
Snapplewee
¥Snapple¥
Posts: 1,086
Threads: 108
Joined: Feb 2007
|
RE: New castles for woe
How about the eco?
Does it burn with the castle?
If it does, this is by far the most stupid decision made on heRO.
|
|
04-04-2008, 11:02 AM |
|
Snapplewee
¥Snapple¥
Posts: 1,086
Threads: 108
Joined: Feb 2007
|
RE: New castles for woe
Wow
Wow wow wow
I can't believe this bs
Cannot BELIEVE IT
|
|
04-04-2008, 11:08 AM |
|
Général_Argos
Removed by GM
Posts: 3,012
Threads: 144
Joined: Jan 2006
|
RE: New castles for woe
GM-Ayu Wrote:Eco drops to 0 as the castle starts fresh.
Really if the owner of the castle thinks that it's fine, why do you care about it? If there's any thing "bad" that goes on, it's the owner of the castle who really lose anything.
LW members invested a lot in the castle, that is why some people do care.
:/
IGN: 9000KRIM Alts: Morradin, KRIMSTEAL
Banned: Krimlin, Krimlogas, Lord_Krimlogas, General_Argos
Krim's grocery list
¯_¯_¯_¯_¯_¯_¯_¯_¯_¯_¯_¯_¯_ -KRIMLIN-¯_¯_¯_¯_¯_¯_¯_¯_¯_¯_¯_¯_¯_¯/
Murphy law. The only true one.
|
|
04-04-2008, 11:55 AM |
|
|