Post Reply 
 
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Votes - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
New castles for woe
Author Message
Général_Argos Offline
Removed by GM
*****

Posts: 3,012
Joined: Jan 2006
Post: #51
RE: New castles for woe

Aaronock Wrote:Well, um...wow...? Thinking
Behemoth owns the castle, they do with it what they want, I fail to see what the problem is?

They have it because of us defending. Eco is high because we helped investing also. Now they make a decision like if they were the only responsible of the castle.

Snapple, I think you should redirect your anger toward behemoth instead of the gms here.Icon_wink

IGN: 9000KRIM Alts:  Morradin, KRIMSTEAL
Banned: Krimlin, Krimlogas, Lord_Krimlogas, General_Argos
Krim's grocery list

¯_¯_¯_¯_¯_¯_¯_¯_¯_¯_¯_¯_¯_-KRIMLIN-¯_¯_¯_¯_¯_¯_¯_¯_¯_¯_¯_¯_¯_¯/
Murphy law.  The only true one.  
[Image: krimstyleg.jpg]
04-04-2008 01:07 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
The Legendary Joe Offline
Raging Alt-a-holic
*****

Posts: 3,691
Joined: Mar 2007
Post: #52
RE: New castles for woe

Personally, as I've stated in other posts, which may or may not have been public, I welcome this change. While the loots from having the eco are a nice bonus, only things I really care about is guild storage and access to the guild dungeons.

Neither of which require a lot of eco, and it's boring doing the same run over and over and over again. We need new terrain
04-04-2008 01:09 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Aaronock Offline
Ethereal Engineer
*****

Posts: 7,642
Joined: Jun 2007
Post: #53
RE: New castles for woe

Well, that's something you guys sound like you need to work out. That's also a risk you take having allies, they can do things you won't like.

But at the same time, I stand by what I said.

[Image: OHeya.gif]

*Aaronock ~ *Ezekiel Stalker ~ *Maxwell Maximillion ~ *Fazil Reis ~ *Cecil Vega
04-04-2008 01:10 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Lysander Offline
Member
***

Posts: 141
Joined: Nov 2007
Post: #54
RE: New castles for woe

*cough* heh, I didnt read the whole 'The owner of the castle PMs Pandora about it thing' I apologizes and fully support this!
04-04-2008 01:56 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Crimson Offline
Member
***

Posts: 91
Joined: Nov 2007
Post: #55
RE: New castles for woe

owned
04-04-2008 01:59 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
GM-Pandora Offline
Admin Extraordinaire
*******

Posts: 14,781
Joined: Sep 2005
Post: #56
RE: New castles for woe

It's ok Lysander, I guess I should have been clearer ^_^;

Ayu stated the condition of castle changing, after sunday only geffen and alde will fit those, until an owner decides they want a change.

~ Server Admin ~
Vote daily to help us grow!
Review us on RateMyServer every 6 months!
Have a problem? Use the Support Ticket System!
Join the Test&Dev team to help out!
04-04-2008 03:47 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
teOx Offline
cry IMBA pls
*****

Posts: 3,556
Joined: Jun 2007
Post: #57
RE: New castles for woe

krim: They have it because of us defending. Eco is high because we helped investing also. Now they make a decision like if they were the only responsible of the castle.

Snapple, I think you should redirect your anger toward behemoth instead of the gms here.
--------------------------------------
+1

so this was behemoths idea of an alliance...

ill remember this.
(This post was last modified: 04-04-2008 04:11 PM by teOx.)
04-04-2008 04:02 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Izael Offline
Cantankerous Geriatric
****

Posts: 332
Joined: Nov 2007
Post: #58
RE: New castles for woe

G?n?ral_Argos Wrote:
Aaronock Wrote:Well, um...wow...? Thinking
Behemoth owns the castle, they do with it what they want, I fail to see what the problem is?

They have it because of us defending. Eco is high because we helped investing also. Now they make a decision like if they were the only responsible of the castle.

Snapple, I think you should redirect your anger toward behemoth instead of the gms here.Icon_wink

Yes, the eco is high, and you helped us defend. You helped us invest, although we, behemoth, did invest more. But you were rewarded with that. You got half the drops from the castle. So I'm not sure why you're complaining now that the alliance is over that we want to do something with our castle.

Really, we know we can't defend the castle against the whole server, so why should we just hand it over? Isn't it a better tactical decision to destroy the eco?

And also, wouldn't a change of scenery be nice? Everyone's been fighting in that castle for a while now. I think a new castle will be refreshing.
04-04-2008 04:32 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Snapplewee Offline
¥Snapple¥

Posts: 1,086
Joined: Feb 2007
Post: #59
RE: New castles for woe

I think Behemoth won't know what castle eco is for the rest of their heRO life.
04-04-2008 04:44 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Snapplewee Offline
¥Snapple¥

Posts: 1,086
Joined: Feb 2007
Post: #60
RE: New castles for woe

The only anger I have toward the GM's is allowing such a stupid rule.

But, I'm glad they've upheld the rules and not made any exceptions.

My anger with Behemoth cannot be put into words.
04-04-2008 05:08 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 


Forum Jump: